The two Parashot* that are before us seal off the book of Sh'mot. Both of
them recapitulate the instructions for constructing the Mishkan, its utensils,
the priests' garments, and reiterate the calling of the two artisans who were
to be in charge of the work. However, because the instructions in our text describe
(or report) the actual implementation of the work, they are animated with a
sense of activity. The act of contribution, for example, is fraught with
enthusiasm and vitality, while everyone appears to be doing his utmost within
his (or her) means and capabilities.
Just before examining these accounts, let us pause
to look at yet another injunction regarding the Shabbat. In this instance it
appears to be a prelude to the construction of the holy edifice, with an
emphasis on keeping the Shabbat set apart by not doing any manner of work
(including kindling of fire): "…
everyone doing work in it shall be put to death" (ref. Ex. 35:2,3). In all likelihood, this was to serve as a
reminder to the Israelites that even the building of the Mishkan does not
supersede the Shabbat rest.
Va’yak’hel: “And he [Moses] gathered…”
is rooted in k.h.l (kof, hey, lamed) - “to gather unto” – for the
purpose of executing the plan. And as we shall see shortly, a
plan is definitely being set up here. In 35:10 an invitation is issued for
"every wise-hearted one among you, let them come and make all which
YHVH has commanded" (emphasis added). Such an open summons had not been announced
previously. The People of Yisrael respond with gusto. They are both
contributing to and participating in the work itself. The camp is
bustling with activity. The skilled and the unskilled, the rich
and the poor, the rank and file together with the leaders – all are doing their
part.
Let us now simply follow the text, taking
note of the activity, the mass inclusion of the entire community, and the spirit
of eager willingness and generosity that pervaded the camp. "And all the congregation of the sons of Israel went out
from Moses. And they came, everyone whose heart was lifted up, and everyone whose
spirit made him willing. They brought the offering of YHVH for the
work of the tabernacle of the congregation, and for all its
service, and for the holy
garments. And the men came in together with the women,
everyone willing of heart. They brought in bracelets, and nose rings,
and rings, and ornaments, every gold article, and everyone who waved a
wave offering of gold to YHVH. And everyone
with whom blue was found, and purple, and crimson, and bleached linen, and
goats' hair, and rams' skins dyed red, and dugong skins, they brought. Everyone rising up with
an offering of silver and bronze, they brought the offering of YHVH; and everyone with whom was found acacia wood for any work of the
service, they brought. And every wise-hearted woman spun
with her hands; and they brought
spun yarn, blue, and purple, and crimson and bleached linen. And all the women whose hearts were lifted up in wisdom spun the goats' hair. And the leaders
brought the onyx stones and stones
for the setting, for the ephod and for the breast pocket, and the spice, and
the oil for the light, and for the anointing oil, and for the incense of the
perfumes. And every man and
woman whose hearts made them willing to bring for all the work
which YHVH commanded to be done by the hand of Moses; the sons of Israel brought a willing offering to YHVH… “(35:20-29, emphases added).
As mentioned, this action-packed passage is
characterized by the willingness and eager participation of everyone involved.
A similar atmosphere is also echoed in chapter 36, where Betzal'el and Ohali'av
(Aholiab) and all the
ones endowed with Elohim-given wisdom and a desire to do the work, take the
contributions from the people: "And they took every offering before Moses which the sons of
Israel had brought for the work of the service in the holy place, to do
it. And they brought to him still more willing offerings morning by
morning. And all the wise men came,
those doing every kind of work for the sanctuary, each one
from his work they were doing” (36:3, 4 emphases added). Here we see the co-operation between
the lay people and the experts, all of whom were providing abundance of such
magnitude, to the extent that Moshe was told: “The people are bringing more
than enough for the service of the work that YHVH commanded to do" (v. 5).
Moshe therefore "commanded, and they caused it to be voiced in the camp,
saying, 'Let neither man nor woman make any more offering for the sanctuary’;
and the people were held back from bringing" (v. 6).
The wisdom,
skill, and expertise with which the work was carried out clearly did not
originate with the expert artisans themselves. In 35:31, 32, 34 we read: “And He has filled him [i.e. Betzal’el] with the spirit of Elohim [can
also be read, “the Spirit of Elohim filled him”] in wisdom, in understanding,
and in knowledge… to devise designs. And He has put in his heart
that he may teach” (emphases added). Betzal’el’s protégé, whom he was
teaching, was Ohali’av from the tribe of Dan. Having been endowed from above
with the skillfulness and ability to carry out the work, Betzal’el, true to his
name, appears to be residing “in the shadow of the Almighty.” As we noted latst
week, the assistant’s name expresses a similar concept, since Ohali’av
means, “my tent is the Father.” Thus, the artist engaged in crafting the
Mishkan (Tabernacle), declares, by his very name, Who is the real Abode!
But let us return to the earthly Mishkan… The specifications for the Ark
of the Covenant, the Table of Showbread, and the Lampstand are
listed in 37:1-24. In
Hebrew these three articles are “a’ron, shulchan, and menorah”
– rendered literally as, “cabinet/closet/chest (e.g. 2nd Kings 12:9,10),
table, and lamp” (e.g. 2nd Kings 4:10); a comfortable abode, under
any circumstances, especially in the desert! But what about a washbasin for a
quick freshening up and maybe a mirror to make sure every hair is in place? The
account in 38:8 does not fail to point out the basin, and the mirrors
out of which it was constructed. In addition, although not mentioned in the
Parasha’s text specifically, there is another term used elsewhere for the Ark
of the Covenant. It is a “ki’seh” – a “chair,” which is also the
Hebrew word for “throne.” The “Ark of the Covenant” is YHVH’s seat of
glory, and was so described in Yisha’yahu (Isaiah) 6:1, in reference to
Shlomo’s (Solomon’s) Temple , and also in
Y’chezkel (Ezekiel) 43:7, regarding the future Temple .
The making of the bronze basin (or laver)
and its base captivates our attention, as they were made from "the mirrors
of the [women] who congregated at the opening of the Tent of Meeting"
(38:8). Much has been said about the symbolism of the mirrors plating this
basin, where the priests were to wash their feet and hands (that is, to
consecrate themselves) before approaching the Altar, as an allusion to one of
the steps on the progressive path of faith taken by the Believer. However, in
the scene at hand we encounter women who have assembled, “tzov'ot,” by the entrance of the Mishkan. The verb and root tz.v.a (tzadi, bet, alef) is also used
for “army” and “hosts,” such as in "YHVH Tzva'ot." In Shmuel Alef (1st
Samuel) 2:22 we find once again this "army of women" by "the
opening of the Tent of Meeing", alhtough in a different (and negative) connotation. In
T’hilim (Psalms) 68:11-12 we read: "YHVH gave the word; great was the
company - "tza'va" - of those who proclaimed [female gender] it;
Kings of armies ("tzva'ot") flee, they flee, and she who remains at
home divides the spoil." Last week
we saw the People of Yisrael in their frenzy to make the golden calf, using
gold earrings worn by their "wives, sons and daughters" (Ex. 32:2).
This week, many of the same people are contributing to the Mishkan, and some of
the donations are of the very same materials that were used for the abominable
image. The women who had contributed the mirrors, thereby giving up their
vanity, are seen here drawn to the house of YHVH forming a company, literally an
"army," which proclaims His Word and is therefore far mightier than
even that of "kings of armies" (ref. again to Ps. 68:12). Hence,
according to the Psalm, their reward (or "spoil") is also far
greater. Were these women motivated by a desire to repent and atone for the recent
terrible sin committed so callously by the People of Yisrael?
When all was said
and done, the work was considered a genuine collective endeavor of national
scope. Not many years prior to this event, these same people had over them taskmasters
who "worked them relentlessly" (Ex. 1:13). Now, the Nation as a whole is engaged
in a totally different “work,” the “avoda” of the Mishkan, the avoda – worship and service - of YHVH.
Did they ever reflect back to those dark days, considering in awe their
currently changed circumstances and status?
Whether or not they did, the transformation that had taken place was
quite amazing! In Egypt
they were treated as a faceless mass, having suffered loss of individual
identity to the point that they were referred to in single person (e.g. Ex.
1:10-13, Parashat Shmot, literal translation). By comparison, in 36:8 – 37:7,
the work performed in the Mishkan is also described in single person. However,
against the backdrop of the preceding descriptions, the picture set before us
here is entirely different. If the oft repeated “and he made” are in reference
to Betzal’el, we are left in no doubt that he had the full and active support,
and participation of the People as a whole. But, if the reference is to more
than one person - it would signify unison. Once again, just as we observed in
Parashat Trumah (in 26:6-11), the Mishkan itself was to be made of a great
variety of components, yet was to be “one” (36:13, 18). This was also the case
with the People of Yisrael, who was (and is) to portray the eternal principle
of ‘unity within diversity,’ so well illustrated by our text.
After the
description of the Nation’s willing participation in the preparations of the
Mishkan, Parashat Fkudey, the last in the book of Sh’mot, continues to
elaborate on the inventory of materials for the sacred edifice and the priests’
official garments. “Fkudey” means, “that which was taken
into account/visited,” or “these are the accounts.” But it is not
only the Mishkan’s inventory that is counted or listed; the term is also
applied here to the congregation itself (38:25, “pkudey ha’eda” – “those
of the congregation who were taken into account/visited”). The meaning of
the root p.k.d. aside from counting, visiting, and commanding, originates with
“invest with purpose or responsibility.”1 Thus, while in Parashat Va’yak’hel
emphasis was placed on the congregation as a “kahal,” a crowd, a mass, host,
whose parts (namely the individuals who make it up) have no significance in and
of themselves, the term “fkudey” stresses the fact that the congregation has no
existence apart from the individuals who make it up. Hence, each and every one
has been “visited” and “taken into account” in order to make the half shekel
payment (ref. 38:25,26).2
In 39:32, we read
the following: "And all the work of the tabernacle of the congregation was
finished (“vate’chal”), and the sons of Israel did
according to all which YHVH commanded Moses; so they did” (emphasis added). In
B’resheet (Genesis) 2:1-2 it says: “And the
heavens and the earth were finished (va’ya’chulu), and all the
host of them. And Elohim finished (va’y’chal) His work which He
had made…” (emphases added). Another parallel to the Creation process is found
in 39:43: “And Moses saw (“va’yar”) all the work, and behold they
had done it…. and Moses blessed them.” This may be compared to the
oft-repeated “and Elohim saw…“ (in B’resheet 1) and also to B’resheet
1:28, where in reference to the creation of man and woman it says, “and He blessed
them” (emphasis added). In 40:33 it says, “And he raised up the court all
around the tabernacle and the altar, and hung up the screen of the court gate.
So Moses finished (va’yechal) the work (m’lacha)”
(emphasis added). Compare this to B’resheet (Genesis) 2:2: “And on the seventh
day Elohim ended (va’yechal) His work (m’lacha) which He had
done…”
The term “tabernacle of the testimony” meets
us in 38:21 and is echoed in 40:3 by the “ark of the testimony,” whereas in
Parashat Ki Tissa we encountered the “tablets of the testimony” (Ex. 34:29). “Testimony”
is “edut” - “a witness” or “evidence.” The reason,
therefore, for the existence of the Mishkan, the ark and that which it
contained (that is the “tablets”) appears to be in order to validate YHVH’s
covenant with His people. “Ed,” witness, and “edut,” testimony, witness or
evidence, originate with the root ayin, vav, dalet (a.o/u.d), whose primal
meaning is to “endure, continue, repeat,” and by implication “to establish
facts.”3 “Od” is therefore “more and continually” and “ad” is “perpetuity,”
while “edot” are YHVH’s “decrees.” The
witnesses (whether human, inanimate objects, decrees, or even Time itself) are
incorporated into the perpetual and firm arrangement to which they are testifying,
in this case being YHVH’s everlasting Covenant.
Earlier, in
Parashat Trumah, we examined the association of the shape of the Menorah (Ex.
25:31-39) to the flora of the Land
of Yisrael . A similar
relationship is thought to exist here too. ”And he gave the table into the
tabernacle of the congregation, on the side of the tabernacle, northward outside the veil; And he put
the lampstand in the tabernacle of the congregation, opposite the table, on the
side of the tabernacle southward…”
(40:22, 24, emphases added). The placing of these articles in the directions
specified above was not coincidental.
The fifty day period between
Pesach and Shavu'ot is when the flowers of the olive open and the kernels of
wheat and barley fill with starch. Thus, the productive fate of these crops is
determined during that season which [in the land of Israel ]
is characterized by multiple changes and climatic contrasts. Scorching southern
winds, which bring with them extreme dryness and heat, alternate with cold
winds from the north and west which generate tempestuous storms containing
thunder, lightning and rain. The northern wind is most beneficial to the wheat,
if it blows during the wheat's early stages of ripening; yet the same wind can
wreak havoc on the olive crop if the buds have already opened into flowers.
Olive blossoms need successive days of dry heat. Both of these crops then
require just the proper balance of the heat waves and cold northern winds,
making the fifty day season (the ‘Omer counting’) a very important and yet
precarious season. The Talmudic sages explained that this phenomenon is
symbolized by placing "the table in the north and the Menorah in the south."
The showbread, which represents the wheat and barley, faced the direction of
the north wind. The Menorah, lit with olive oil, faced the direction of the
southern wind. Placed together in the Holy
Place , they symbolize the plea to the One Creator
that each wind would come at the right time.4
Obviously it is only YHVH Who
is able to hold all the elements of His Creation in the perfect balance
required. Thus, He is seen using (more than once) the Land of Yisrael
and the variety of its natural conditions as an instrument for building and
maintaining the relationship with His People, as well as for instructing and
chastising them. And, as we have already observed, this concept is implemented
well before the Israelites even enter the Land of Promise !
The two Parashot, Va’yakhel
and Fkudey complement one another. Whereas, Va’ya’kehl informs us about the
making of the vessels of the Mishkan, Parashat Fkudey “pours” content and
meaning into them: The tablets are placed in the Ark of the Covenant, the bread
is laid on the Table of Showbread, the wicks are lit in the Menorah, and the
incense is burned5. We are also informed, of course, in detail about the making
of the vestments of those who were to officiate in YHVH’s abode, i.e. the
priests. Interestingly, the materials used for these garments -“gold,
blue, purple, and scarlet and the
fine woven linen” - were also used in the
making of the Mishkan itself.
Among the various parts of the high priest’s
regalia was “the plate of the holy crown of pure gold” and on it “an
inscription like the engraving of a signet: HOLINESS TO
YHVH” (39:30). In 39:6 we read, similarly, about the two onyx stones that
were placed on the high priest’s shoulders, with the names of the tribes etched
on them. In this way the high priest
would approach YHVH on behalf of His people.
“An engraving (or “etching”) of a signet” is rendered “pituchey
chotam”- literally “the engravings of a seal.” Digging a little deeper, we discover that
whereas “chotam” is a seal, “pituchey” (engravings of…) originates from the
root p.t.ch (peh, tav, chet) meaning “to open” or “opening.” So, how is it that a “seal” and an “opening”
signify the onyx stones as well as the engraving upon the high priest’s
crown? Do these two seemingly opposing
terms allude to something beyond that which meets the eye? In Revelation
Chapter 5 Yeshua is seen worthy of opening a special “book” and breaking
its seals. What was it that
enabled Yeshua to carry out this most important task, which no one else could
execute? Having given up His life, He redeemed for His Father those who are to
be kings and priests who will reign on earth. Our High Priest stood before the
Father with the proverbial onyx stones on His shoulders and the golden band
with “Holiness unto YHVH” on His forehead. Qualified to open the sealed
book of redemption, He was displaying His ultimate task of presenting to
His Father those whom He had purchased by His blood, opening the way by enabling
them to be “the sealed servants of Elohim” (Revelation 7:3 italics added).
* Parashot – plural
for “Parasha” – “Parashat…” Parasha of… (e.g. Va’yak’hel)
1
Etymological Dictionary of Biblical Hebew, based on the commentaties of Samsom
Raphael Hirsch, Matityahu Clark, Feldheim Publishers, Jerusalem, - New York,
1999.
2 http://www.kipa.co.il/pash/
3
Etymological Dictionary of Biblical Hebrew
4 Nature in Our Biblical
Heritage, Nogah Hareuveni, trans. Helen Frenkley,
Neot Kdumim Ltd. Lod , Israel , 1996.
Hebrew Tools for Everyday
Use
The hectic work that has
been described above will inspire us to state that,
“every man and woman
worked” - Kol eesh ve’eesha avd. In the assembling of the women we have the
verb which forms the noun “army” – tzava, with more of the furniture of the
Mishkan being in use: shulchan – table and “shulchanot” – tables, and likewise
“kis’eh” – chair, and “kis’ot” – chairs. We will learn how to use these nouns
in everyday life. We also
looked at “edut” – testimony – which is rooted in “ed” – witness (“edim”
plural), and at Moshe’s “seeing” the “work” – “m’la’cha” (not “avoda” this
time, which is another term for “work”). In “engraving of a signet”, we
learned, was ‘hidden’ the verb “open” and hence “opening”, and that will seal
our lesson at this time.
The army has tables
La’tza’va yesh shulchanot
The army had no chairs
La’tzava lo hayu kis’ot (lit. to the army
there were no chairs)
He sees the witness
Hu ro’eh et ha’ed
He saw the witnesses
Hu ra’ah et h’e’dim
There was much work
Hayta m’lacha raba (literally, there was
work much)
Yeshua opened the opening to the Mishkan
Yeshua patach et ha’petach la’Mishkan
No comments:
Post a Comment