The two Parashot* that are before us seal off the book of Sh'mot. Both of them recapitulate the instructions for constructing the Mishkan, its utensils, the priests' garments, and reiterate the calling of the two artisans who were to be in charge of the work. However, because the instructions in our text describe (or report) the actual implementation of the work, they are animated with a sense of activity. The act of contribution, for example, is fraught with enthusiasm and vitality, while everyone appears to be doing his utmost within his (or her) means and capabilities.
Just before examining these accounts, let us pause to look at yet another injunction regarding the Shabbat. In this instance it appears to be a prelude to the construction of the holy edifice, with an emphasis on keeping the Shabbat set apart by not doing any manner of work (including kindling of fire): "… everyone doing work in it shall be put to death" (ref. Ex. 35:2,3). In all likelihood, this was to serve as a reminder to the Israelites that even the building of the Mishkan does not supersede the Shabbat rest.
Va’yak’hel: “And he [Moses] gathered…” is rooted in k.h.l (kof, hey, lamed) - “to gather unto” – for the purpose of executing the plan. And as we shall see shortly, a plan is definitely being set up here. In 35:10 an invitation is issued for "every wise-hearted one among you, let them come and make all which YHVH has commanded" (emphasis added). Such an open summons had not been announced previously. The People of Yisrael respond with gusto. They are both contributing to and participating in the work itself. The camp is bustling with activity. The skilled and the unskilled, the rich and the poor, the rank and file together with the leaders – all are doing their part.
Let us now simply follow the text, taking note of the activity, the mass inclusion of the entire community, and the spirit of eager willingness and generosity that pervaded the camp. "And all the congregation of the sons of
from Moses. And they came, everyone whose heart was lifted up, and everyone whose
spirit made him willing. They brought the offering of YHVH for the
work of the tabernacle of the congregation, and for all its
service, and for the holy
garments. And the men came in together with the women,
everyone willing of heart. They brought in bracelets, and nose rings,
and rings, and ornaments, every gold article, and everyone who waved a
wave offering of gold to YHVH. And everyone
with whom blue was found, and purple, and crimson, and bleached linen, and
goats' hair, and rams' skins dyed red, and dugong skins, they brought. Everyone rising up with
an offering of silver and bronze, they brought the offering of YHVH; and everyone with whom was found acacia wood for any work of the
service, they brought. And every wise-hearted woman spun
with her hands; and they brought
spun yarn, blue, and purple, and crimson and bleached linen. And all the women whose hearts were lifted up in wisdom spun the goats' hair. And the leaders
brought the onyx stones and stones
for the setting, for the ephod and for the breast pocket, and the spice, and
the oil for the light, and for the anointing oil, and for the incense of the
perfumes. And every man and
woman whose hearts made them willing to bring for all the work
which YHVH commanded to be done by the hand of Moses; the sons of Israel brought a willing offering to YHVH… “(35:20-29, emphases added). Israel
As mentioned, this action-packed passage is characterized by the willingness and eager participation of everyone involved. A similar atmosphere is also echoed in chapter 36, where Betzal'el and Ohali'av (Aholiab) and all the ones endowed with Elohim-given wisdom and a desire to do the work, take the contributions from the people: "And they took every offering before Moses which the sons of Israel had brought for the work of the service in the holy place, to do it. And they brought to him still more willing offerings morning by morning. And all the wise men came, those doing every kind of work for the sanctuary, each one from his work they were doing” (36:3, 4 emphases added). Here we see the co-operation between the lay people and the experts, all of whom were providing abundance of such magnitude, to the extent that Moshe was told: “The people are bringing more than enough for the service of the work that YHVH commanded to do" (v. 5). Moshe therefore "commanded, and they caused it to be voiced in the camp, saying, 'Let neither man nor woman make any more offering for the sanctuary’; and the people were held back from bringing" (v. 6).
The wisdom, skill, and expertise with which the work was carried out clearly did not originate with the expert artisans themselves. In 35:31, 32, 34 we read: “And He has filled him [i.e. Betzal’el] with the spirit of Elohim [can also be read, “the Spirit of Elohim filled him”] in wisdom, in understanding, and in knowledge… to devise designs. And He has put in his heart that he may teach” (emphases added). Betzal’el’s protégé, whom he was teaching, was Ohali’av from the tribe of Dan. Having been endowed from above with the skillfulness and ability to carry out the work, Betzal’el, true to his name, appears to be residing “in the shadow of the Almighty.” As we noted latst week, the assistant’s name expresses a similar concept, since Ohali’av means, “my tent is the Father.” Thus, the artist engaged in crafting the Mishkan (Tabernacle), declares, by his very name, Who is the real Abode!
But let us return to the earthly Mishkan… The specifications for the Ark of the Covenant, the Table of Showbread, and the Lampstand are listed in 37:1-
Hebrew these three articles are “a’ron, shulchan, and menorah”
– rendered literally as, “cabinet/closet/chest (e.g. 2nd Kings 12:9,10),
table, and lamp” (e.g. 2nd Kings 4:10); a comfortable abode, under
any circumstances, especially in the desert! But what about a washbasin for a
quick freshening up and maybe a mirror to make sure every hair is in place? The
account in 38:8 does not fail to point out the basin, and the mirrors
out of which it was constructed. In addition, although not mentioned in the
Parasha’s text specifically, there is another term used elsewhere for the Ark
of the Covenant. It is a “ki’seh” – a “chair,” which is also the
Hebrew word for “throne.” The “Ark of the Covenant” is YHVH’s seat of
glory, and was so described in Yisha’yahu (Isaiah) 6:1, in reference to
Shlomo’s (Solomon’s) Temple, and also in
Y’chezkel (Ezekiel) 43:7, regarding the future . Temple
The making of the bronze basin (or laver) and its base captivates our attention, as they were made from "the mirrors of the [women] who congregated at the opening of the Tent of Meeting" (38:8). Much has been said about the symbolism of the mirrors plating this basin, where the priests were to wash their feet and hands (that is, to consecrate themselves) before approaching the Altar, as an allusion to one of the steps on the progressive path of faith taken by the Believer. However, in the scene at hand we encounter women who have assembled, “tzov'ot,” by the entrance of the Mishkan. The verb and root tz.v.a (tzadi, bet, alef) is also used for “army” and “hosts,” such as in "YHVH Tzva'ot." In Shmuel Alef (1st Samuel) 2:22 we find once again this "army of women" by "the opening of the Tent of Meeing." In T’hilim (Psalms) 68:11-12 we read: "YHVH gave the word; great was the company - "tza'va" - of those who proclaimed [female gender] it; Kings of armies ("tzva'ot") flee, they flee, and she who remains at home divides the spoil." Last week we saw the People of Yisrael in their frenzy to make the golden calf, using gold earrings worn by their "wives, sons and daughters" (Ex. 32:2). This week, many of the same people are contributing to the Mishkan, and some of the donations are of the very same materials that were used for the abominable image. The women who had contributed the mirrors, thereby giving up their vanity, are seen here drawn to the house of YHVH forming a company, literally an "army," which proclaims His Word and is therefore far mightier than even that of "kings of armies" (ref. again to Ps. 68:12). Hence, according to the Psalm, their reward (or "spoil") is also far greater. Were these women motivated by a desire to repent and atone for the recent terrible sin committed so callously by the People of Yisrael?
When all was said and done, the work was considered a genuine collective endeavor of national scope. Not many years prior to this event, these same people had over them taskmasters who "worked them relentlessly" (Ex. 1:13). Now, the Nation as a whole is engaged in a totally different “work,” the “avoda” of the Mishkan, the avoda – worship and service - of YHVH. Did they ever reflect back to those dark days, considering in awe their currently changed circumstances and status?
Whether or not they did, the transformation that had taken place was quite amazing! In
they were treated as a faceless mass, having suffered loss of individual
identity to the point that they were referred to in single person (e.g. Ex.
1:10-13, Parashat Shmot, literal translation). By comparison, in 36:8 – 37:7,
the work performed in the Mishkan is also described in single person. However,
against the backdrop of the preceding descriptions, the picture set before us
here is entirely different. If the oft repeated “and he made” are in reference
to Betzal’el, we are left in no doubt that he had the full and active support,
and participation of the People as a whole. But, if the reference is to more
than one person - it would signify unison. Once again, just as we observed in
Parashat Trumah (in 26:6-11), the Mishkan itself was to be made of a great
variety of components, yet was to be “one” (36:13, 18). This was also the case
with the People of Yisrael, who was (and is) to portray the eternal principle
of ‘unity within diversity,’ so well illustrated by our text. Egypt
After the description of the Nation’s willing participation in the preparations of the Mishkan, Parashat Fkudey, the last in the book of Sh’mot, continues to elaborate on the inventory of materials for the sacred edifice and the priests’ official garments. “Fkudey” means, “that which was taken into account/visited,” or “these are the accounts.” But it is not only the Mishkan’s inventory that is counted or listed; the term is also applied here to the congregation itself (38:25, “pkudey ha’eda” – “those of the congregation who were taken into account/visited”). The meaning of the root p.k.d. aside from counting, visiting, and commanding, originates with “invest with purpose or responsibility.”1 Thus, while in Parashat Va’yak’hel emphasis was placed on the congregation as a “kahal,” a crowd, a mass, host, whose parts (namely the individuals who make it up) have no significance in and of themselves, the term “fkudey” stresses the fact that the congregation has no existence apart from the individuals who make it up. Hence, each and every one has been “visited” and “taken into account” in order to make the half shekel payment (ref. 38:25,26).2
In 39:32, we read the following: "And all the work of the tabernacle of the congregation was finished (“vate’chal”), and the sons of
according to all which YHVH commanded Moses; so they did” (emphasis added). In
B’resheet (Genesis) 2:1-2 it says: “And the
heavens and the earth were finished (va’ya’chulu), and all the
host of them. And Elohim finished (va’y’chal) His work which He
had made…” (emphases added). Another parallel to the Creation process is found
in 39:43: “And Moses saw (“va’yar”) all the work, and behold they
had done it…. and Moses blessed them.” This may be compared to the
oft-repeated “and Elohim saw…“ (in B’resheet 1) and also to B’resheet
1:28, where in reference to the creation of man and woman it says, “and He blessed
them” (emphasis added). In 40:33 it says, “And he raised up the court all
around the tabernacle and the altar, and hung up the screen of the court gate.
So Moses finished (va’yechal) the work (m’lacha)”
(emphasis added). Compare this to B’resheet (Genesis) 2:2: “And on the seventh
day Elohim ended (va’yechal) His work (m’lacha) which He had
The term “tabernacle of the testimony” meets us in 38:21 and is echoed in 40:3 by the “ark of the testimony,” whereas in Parashat Ki Tissa we encountered the “tablets of the testimony” (Ex. 34:29). “Testimony” is “edut” - “a witness” or “evidence.” The reason, therefore, for the existence of the Mishkan, the ark and that which it contained (that is the “tablets”) appears to be in order to validate YHVH’s covenant with His people. “Ed,” witness, and “edut,” testimony, witness or evidence, originate with the root ayin, vav, dalet (a.o/u.d), whose primal meaning is to “endure, continue, repeat,” and by implication “to establish facts.”3 “Od” is therefore “more and continually” and “ad” is “perpetuity,” while “edot” are YHVH’s “decrees.” The witnesses (whether human, inanimate objects, decrees, or even Time itself) are incorporated into the perpetual and firm arrangement to which they are testifying, in this case being YHVH’s everlasting Covenant.
Earlier, in Parashat Trumah, we examined the association of the shape of the Menorah (Ex. 25:31-39) to the flora of the
. A similar
relationship is thought to exist here too. ”And he gave the table into the
tabernacle of the congregation, on the side of the tabernacle, northward outside the veil; And he put
the lampstand in the tabernacle of the congregation, opposite the table, on the
side of the tabernacle southward…”
(40:22, 24, emphases added). The placing of these articles in the directions
specified above was not coincidental. Land
The fifty day period between Pesach and Shavu'ot is when the flowers of the olive open and the kernels of wheat and barley fill with starch. Thus, the productive fate of these crops is determined during that season which [in the
is characterized by multiple changes and climatic contrasts. Scorching southern
winds, which bring with them extreme dryness and heat, alternate with cold
winds from the north and west which generate tempestuous storms containing
thunder, lightning and rain. The northern wind is most beneficial to the wheat,
if it blows during the wheat's early stages of ripening; yet the same wind can
wreak havoc on the olive crop if the buds have already opened into flowers.
Olive blossoms need successive days of dry heat. Both of these crops then
require just the proper balance of the heat waves and cold northern winds,
making the fifty day season (the ‘Omer counting’) a very important and yet
precarious season. The Talmudic sages explained that this phenomenon is
symbolized by placing "the table in the north and the Menorah in the south."
The showbread, which represents the wheat and barley, faced the direction of
the north wind. The Menorah, lit with olive oil, faced the direction of the
southern wind. Placed together in the land of Israel Holy
Place, they symbolize the plea to the One Creator
that each wind would come at the right time.4
Obviously it is only YHVH Who is able to hold all the elements of His Creation in the perfect balance required. Thus, He is seen using (more than once) the
and the variety of its natural conditions as an instrument for building and
maintaining the relationship with His People, as well as for instructing and
chastising them. And, as we have already observed, this concept is implemented
well before the Israelites even enter the Land of Yisrael !
Land of Promise
The two Parashot, Va’yakhel and Fkudey complement one another. Whereas, Va’ya’kehl informs us about the making of the vessels of the Mishkan, Parashat Fkudey “pours” content and meaning into them: The tablets are placed in the Ark of the Covenant, the bread is laid on the Table of Showbread, the wicks are lit in the Menorah, and the incense is burned5. We are also informed, of course, in detail about the making of the vestments of those who were to officiate in YHVH’s abode, i.e. the priests. Interestingly, the materials used for these garments -“gold, blue, purple, and scarlet and the fine woven linen” - were also used in the making of the Mishkan itself.
Among the various parts of the high priest’s regalia was “the plate of the holy crown of pure gold” and on it “an inscription like the engraving of a signet: HOLINESS TO YHVH” (39:30). In 39:6 we read, similarly, about the two onyx stones that were placed on the high priest’s shoulders, with the names of the tribes etched on them. In this way the high priest would approach YHVH on behalf of His people. “An engraving (or “etching”) of a signet” is rendered “pituchey chotam”- literally “the engravings of a seal.” Digging a little deeper, we discover that whereas “chotam” is a seal, “pituchey” (engravings of…) originates from the root p.t.ch (peh, tav, chet) meaning “to open” or “opening.” So, how is it that a “seal” and an “opening” signify the onyx stones as well as the engraving upon the high priest’s crown? Do these two seemingly opposing terms allude to something beyond that which meets the eye? In Revelation Chapter 5 Yeshua is seen worthy of opening a special “book” and breaking its seals. What was it that enabled Yeshua to carry out this most important task, which no one else could execute? Having given up His life, He redeemed for His Father those who are to be kings and priests who will reign on earth. Our High Priest stood before the Father with the proverbial onyx stones on His shoulders and the golden band with “Holiness unto YHVH” on His forehead. Qualified to open the sealed book of redemption, He was displaying His ultimate task of presenting to His Father those whom He had purchased by His blood, opening the way by enabling them to be “the sealed servants of Elohim” (Revelation 7:3 italics added).
* Parashot – plural for “Parasha” – “Parashat…” Parasha of… (e.g. Va’yak’hel)
1 Etymological Dictionary of Biblical Hebew, based on the commentaties of Samsom Raphael Hirsch, Matityahu Clark, Feldheim Publishers, Jerusalem, - New York, 1999.
3 Etymological Dictionary of Biblical Hebrew
4 Nature in Our Biblical Heritage, Nogah Hareuveni, trans. Helen Frenkley, Neot Kdumim Ltd.
, 1996. Lod, Israel
Hebrew Tools for Everyday Use
The hectic work that has been described above will inspire us to state that,
“every man and woman worked” - Kol eesh ve’eesha avd. In the assembling of the women we have the verb which forms the noun “army” – tzava, with more of the furniture of the Mishkan being in use: shulchan – table and “shulchanot” – tables, and likewise “kis’eh” – chair, and “kis’ot” – chairs. We will learn how to use these nouns in everyday life. We also looked at “edut” – testimony – which is rooted in “ed” – witness (“edim” plural), and at Moshe’s “seeing” the “work” – “m’la’cha” (not “avoda” this time, which is another term for “work”). In “engraving of a signet”, we learned, was ‘hidden’ the verb “open” and hence “opening”, and that will seal our lesson at this time.
The army has tables
La’tza’va yesh shulchanot
The army had no chairs
La’tzava lo hayu kis’ot (lit. to the army there were no chairs)
He sees the witness
Hu ro’eh et ha’ed
He saw the witnesses
Hu ra’ah et h’e’dim
There was much work
Hayta m’lacha raba (literally, there was work much)
Yeshua opened the opening to the Mishkan
Yeshua patach et ha’petach