"When you lift up ["ki tissa"]
the head [singular] of the sons of Israel to be mustered, they shall each give
the ransom of his soul to YHVH in mustering them, and there shall not be a
plague among them in mustering them" (Ex. 30:12, literal translation).
Hundreds of years later, when King David made an attempt to conduct a census,
YHVH reprimanded him heavily ("And Satan stood up against Israel
and moved David to number Israel …
And it was evil in the eyes of Elohim as to this thing". 1st Ch.
21:1,7). But whereas David counted (“mana” – meaning “apportion, divide,
limit”) the people, YHVH asked Moshe to “lift up” the sons of Yisrael, since
people are not to be numbered as a commodity. Each individual was, as it were,
to be lifted up to his Maker. For a proper conduct of the census, every one
between age twenty and fifty had to offer a representational half shekel as a
token, called a "ransom"
("kofer," of the root k.f.r.
that is "kippur," meaning “propitiation, covering”). This half shekel "atonement
money" given to YHVH as a contribution ("trumah"), was then rendered
"for the service of the Tent of Meeting [ohel mo'ed]”, for it to "be
a memorial of the sons of Israel before YHVH to make atonement
for yourselves" (30:16 emphases added). This atonement (or ransom) money
became a contribution to help in constructing of the place where these sons of
Yisrael will eventually be atoned for and remembered. Interestingly, later
on in the Parasha, in 34:23, we read: “Three
times in the year your men shall appear before YHVH”. In Hebrew “man” or
“male” is “zachar” (literally, “one who remembered”), but
here the word has been modified to “za’chur”, which means “one who is
remembered”. Here it would be appropriate to add that Yeshua has paid in full for
the required atonement, much more than a half shekel, “and [also] raised
[lifted] us up with Him, and seated us with Him in the heavenly places” (Eph. 2:6).
Going back to our census, we see how it enabled further national
organization to take place, while offering an opportunity for contributions to
be collected for the construction of Ohel Mo’ed (“tent of meeting”, as it is
referred to in this Parasha). This pragmatism, wherein the nation's practical
and spiritual needs were combined, illustrates the Torah’s intrinsic and
typical economic proclivity for fusing various components and aspects of life
into one act or event, as seen here. This act also made clear that, before the
Almighty all were equal: “The rich shall not give more and the poor shall not
give less than half a shekel” (30:15).
More instructions for articles and utensils, which are to make up the
future Mishkan, follow. In 30:17-21, the brazen laver is mentioned, and then
the instructions for making the incense and anointing oil (ref. vs. 23-25).
"It shall not be poured on the flesh of man, and you shall not make any
like it in its proportion; it is holy. It shall be holy to you. If a man
prepares any like it, or who gives from it to a stranger, he shall be cut off
from his people" (30:32,33), is the injunction in connection to both (the
oil and the incense, see also vs. 37, 38). No doubt the exclusive usage of
these articles may also be applied to our lives, making distinctions between
that which is set apart and that which is not so and not mixing the two.
Now that all the instructions with respect to the Mishkan are in place,
it becomes necessary to select the artisans to execute the work. The men chosen
by YHVH are Betzal'el the son of Oori, the son of Choor from Yehuda, who was
filled with YHVH's Spirit, and Ohali'av (“Father is My Tent”) the son of
Achi'se'mach from the tribe of Dan. These two were endowed with all the wisdom,
understanding, knowledge and skills that it would take "to make all that I
have commanded…" (ref. 31:1-6). YHVH declares, "I have called by name
Betzal'el" (31:2, emphasis
added), and indeed the meaning of the name is "in the shadow of the
Almighty" ("beh"-"in"; "tzel"- “shadow”;
“el"-"mighty").
Just
before Moshe's return with the Torah instructions, inscribed on the tablets of
the testimony "by the finger of Elohim" (31:18), attention is given
once more to the Shabbat. It is to be "as a sign between Me and you,
throughout your generations, that you may know that I am YHVH who sanctifies
[separates/sets apart] you" (31:13). Shabbat is seen here as the seal for
the "everlasting [or perpetual] covenant" (v. 16) that YHVH made with
Yisrael, who, as a nation is to testify to the fact that He "made heaven
and earth in six days and in the seventh He ceased and was refreshed".
These instructions are preceded by one little word, "ach" (v. 13), translated, "but", “surely”,
or "as for you". However, in this context it appears to mean, "whatever else you do [keep My Sabbaths]”! All seems to be in order
now. YHVH hands Moshe the stone tablets He had written, and Moshe is about to
descend from the mountain and deliver the Divine message to the People.
Suddenly there is a shift
of scene and time. At what point exactly was it that the people's restlessness
and disenchantment with Moshe led them to put pressure on A'ha’ron to ease off
their frustrations? The answer to that remains unknown, but what our text does
inform us about, is the people's firm resolve to alleviate these frustrations.
"And the people saw that
Moses delayed to come down from the mountain. And the people gathered to Aaron.
And they said to him, 'Rise up, make for us gods who may go before our face. As
for this Moses, the man who brought us up from the land of Egypt ,
we do not know what has become of him'" (32:1).
Several key words in this text (32:1-6) help in unraveling this scene as
it unfolds. Moshe's delay here is "boshesh," its root being "bosh" (bet, vav, shin) whose
primary meaning is “shame, disgrace, to cause shame
and disgrace, or embarrassment (e.g. Gen. 2:25), withering,
dryness and destruction”. This verb decodes the emotions and
thoughts that were plaguing the anxious Israelites. It is not difficult to
envision them expressing the following sentiments: “What embarrassment and shame
is this man Moshe subjecting us to! His strange ways and disappearance will be
our demise, and we will wither
and be destroyed in this
desert!” A large crowd gathers around A'ha’ron, denoted by "(va)yika'hel", of the root k.h.l (kof, hey, lamed) which means “assembly
or congregation”. Thus, the assembly of Yisrael congregates around the
only person whom they deem able to execute the plan that they had already
formulated. To the "elohim" which they demand that A'haron make for
them, they refer in the plural (“make us gods, which shall go before us” 32:1), being in direct defiance of what
they had heard just a little while earlier… "You shall have no other gods
before Me" (Parashat Yitro, Ex. 20:3). With bitter sarcasm they refer to
Moshe as "this man who brought us out of Egypt ", while at the same time
not only forgetting the miracles and wonders it took to extricate them out of
the land of their affliction, but also avoiding any reference to YHVH Himself.
"Seeing that Moshe had
delayed" (32:1 italics added), they are now calling for visible
gods which would "walk before their faces”. This is another contrary
concept, as the individuals and the nation were to “walk before Elohim’s face”,
and not the other way around (e.g. Gen. 17:1, 24:40; 1st Sam. 2:30;
1st Kings 2:4, 8:25, 9:4).
In an attempt to placate the crowd, A'ha’ron complies, instructing anyone
wearing jewelry to "remove"
their gold earrings, using, not coincidentally, the imperative plural form for
"tear off", which is “par'ku"
(32:2). The verb p.r.k (pey, resh, kof) also means “to part, to rip
(Ps. 7:2), to fragment, or to tear” (I Kings 19:11; Ezekiel 19:12), thus
all-too accurately describing the overall condition of those who were "tearing off" their jewels to make gods for themselves!
In
the process A'ha’ron takes a stylus
- che'ret (ch.r.t, chet, resh, tet)
(32:4), which seems to share the root with one of the words for "magicians" (such as those who
operated in Egypt ,
e.g. Ex.8:7,18) - "chartumin"),
making up for an intriguing connection (in light of the circumstances). Before we go on with this scene, it is
interesting to compare the above (“stylus”) with another reference to a
“stylus” and “etching” (or “engraving”). Thus, in 32:16, it says about the
tablets being “engraved” by the “finger of Elohim”. “Engraved” is spelt
“charut”, but not with a tet (like the above), but with a tav, which makes it
very close to “cherut”, liberty. The comparison and contrast between the “magician”-like
formation of the calf, and the “liberty” that seems to be associated with the
tablets that YHVH engraved, is very striking (cf. James 1:24, the “Torah of
liberty”). Back to A’ha’ron. With the stylus A’ha’ron formed - "(ve)yatzar" - the "molten calf" - "egel ma'seh'cha". "Formed"
is of the root y.tz.r (yod,
tzadi, resh) which goes back to "thought, imagination and
contemplation" - "yetzer" - such as used in B’resheet (Genesis)
6:5, and 8:21 respectively: "Every imagination of the thoughts of his
heart"; "The imagination of the heart of man is evil from his youth".
It is nothing less than "evil imagination"
which yields the results of this sad episode. The calf, "egel",
is rooted in a.g.l (ayin,
gimmel, lamed), meaning, "round or roll", referring to a young calf
as it rolls, bounds or gallops. This particular calf, though, was a "ma'seh'cha", that is a molten image. "Ma'seh'cha" is
also a “covering” or a “veil”, such as the "veil covering all the
nations" found in Yishayahu (Isaiah) 25:7, where it is in the form
of the alliteration: "ma'seh'cha
nesu'cha".
Thus, whereas in Parashat Mishpatim (in 21:1) we saw that Moshe was to
place the Torah in front of YHVH's chosen Nation as a mirror, here the
backsliding Israelites, who are so desperate to see with their eyes (as
pointed out above), actually suffer a loss of sight, as they are blindfolded by a
"ma'seh'cha" (a veil) of their own making. In 34:17, in the course of
the renewal of the Covenant, it is necessary to remind them once again, “You
shall make no molten gods – elohey ma’seh’cha”.
Continuing in chapter 32: “…And they rose early on the morrow, and they
offered burnt offerings and brought near peace offerings. And the people sat
down to eat and drink, and rose up to play" (v. 6, emphasis added).
The offense of these descendants of Yitz'chak (Isaac) climaxes when they act in
total defiance to the stern warning, which was presented to them in Sh’mot
(Exodus) 22:20 (and 34:14): "One sacrificing to gods shall be destroyed”.
The verb for “play” is "(le)tza'chek"
(of the root tz.ch.k, tzadi,
chet, kof - “to laugh") and
is used here, implying "making sport, toying with, mocking",
or "conjugal caresses" - all of which speak of the lewd
debauchery in which Yitzchak’s progeny was engaging.
YHVH discloses to the unsuspecting Moshe the gory details of what "your people whom you brought up out of Egypt " (literal translation,
italics added) have done, and with that He (symbolically) charges him "to
go… to descend" (32:7). The all-knowing Elohim, being aware of the fact that
Moshe would beseech Him on behalf of this reproachable people, makes here a
declaration (v. 10), allowing us a rare glimpse into what is otherwise an 'off
limits' domain of His deep hurt: "Leave Me alone (that My anger may
glow against them, that I may consume them)" (italics added). But Moshe's uninterrupted intercessory address
(vs. 11-13) does result in YHVH being "moved to pity concerning the evil
which He had spoken to do to His people" (v. 14).
The language employed in 32:15,16 could not be more emphatic in recounting
the preciousness of the divinely written tablets: “…the two tablets of the
testimony… tablets written on their two sides, on this and on that side they
were written. And the tablets were the work of Elohim, and the writing was the
writing of Elohim; it was engraved on the tablets". All this is in sharp
contrast to the horrendous sight awaiting Moshe at the foot of the Mountain.
“When Joshua heard the noise of the people as they shouted, he said to
Moses. ‘There is a noise of war in the camp’” (32:17). The “noise” that Yehoshua
heard is “be’ra’o”, which is a very unusual way to say “teruah”. The sound
echoes “ra” or “ra’ah” (resh, ayin) – evil, and indeed just a little further,
A’ha’ron says about the people, “the are set on evil” – ra (v. 22ץ Refer also to 32:12,14, where ‘harm’ – ra’ah - is
used 3 times). This follows the burning of the image,
grinding its ashes to powder and mixing it with water, an act preformed by
Moshe, who then made the people of Yisrael drink this concoction. YHVH’s messenger was acting on behalf of a
jealous Husband who was more than suspicious of His wife’s unfaithfulness and
betrayal (see Numbers 5:11 ff – the “law of jealousy”). “She”, therefore, had
to partake of this unsavory drink.
After
a sad confrontation with A'ha’ron, during which the latter defends his position
by making weak excuses, Moshe realizes that the People is "loosed –
unrestrained - for Aaron had let it loose – be unrestrained - for derision
among their enemies" (32: 25). The words for "loose" used here stem from "para" (p.r.a. pey/fey, resh, ayin). As we observed already in
Parashat Miketz (Gen. 41-44:17), the same consonants also appear in Par'oh's
name. The question that arises here is whether the meaning of this root
("unruly," "disorder", “unrestrained”) had any bearing on
the meaning of the title accorded to the Egyptian monarchs (although
"Par'oh", as we noted there, does have its specific and separate
meaning in the Ancient Egyptian tongue).
This issue seems to be quite pertinent in this case, as the Hebrews were
certainly manifesting a reversal to practices which they no doubt observed in
land of their sojourning. Likewise, we have just seen a resemblance of the word
denoting Egypt ’s
magicians to the tool used by A'ha’ron to make the calf.
The
first six verses of chapter 33 describe a transitional phase, leading to the
restitution of relationship between YHVH and His People. As part of the
People's mourning and repentance, they remove the rest of their jewels (verse
6). Interestingly, the verb for removing the jewels is not the same as the one used
above (32:2). Instead, there is the unusual usage of a word that in Shmot
(Exodus) 12:36 was employed for "spoiling"
(the Egyptians). This verb – va’yit’natzlu - shares its root (y.tz.l
yod, tzadi, lamed) with the verb for "deliver"
(Ex. 3:8). Being used here in the course of healing the breach in the
relationship with the Almighty, could be a reminder to Yisrael of their miraculous
deliverance from Egypt .
In
the course of Moshe’s intercession on behalf of the People of Yisrael, YHVH says
to him: “… lead the people to that which I have told you…” (literal
translation, 32:34). “N’cheh” is the imperative here for “lead”.
Later on, in 33:14, after a long discourse between YHVH and Moshe, the Holy One
promises: “My Presence – panim-face – will go, and I will give you rest”
(literal translation). “Give rest” – hani’choti – actually shares
its root with “lead”, and more specifically, “leading toward a goal”, without
forgetting, of course, the element of “rest”. Thus, it was only by virtue of YHVH’s
“restful and purposeful guidance” that Moshe was able to be the goal-oriented
leader that he was.
The rest of the Parasha
deals with issues relating, not surprisingly in view of the recent events, to
YHVH's presence, His reverence, His revelation to Moshe, and to the renewal of
the Covenant. In mentioning Moshe's
writing of the "d'varim" – “words” on the new stone tablets, the
figure "ten" is cited (34:28), unlike the first mention of these
“words”, where no number was specified (Parashat Yitro, Ex. chapter 20). In this verse (28) Moshe is described as
staying on the Mount, in the Presence of YHVH, for forty days during which time
he wrote the tablets, abstaining from food and drink. In 24:10,11 (Parashat
Mishpatim) we encountered the elders and nobles of Yisrael ‘seeing’ the Elohim
of Yisrael while “eating and drinking”, just prior to Moshe’s first ascent to
the Mountain. These two scenes, against the backdrop of the two contrasting
circumstances, form quite an object lesson; the one foreshadowing the “Marriage
Supper of the Lamb” and the time when He will dwell with His own (Rev. 19:9),
while the other is signified by markings of sorrow and mourning, resulting from
the sin committed by the Nation.
The variety of events crowding Parashat Ki Tissa illustrates, in
microcosmic fashion, the topsy-turvy nature of Yisrael's relationship with her
Elohim in years to come. Finally, having
had the "maseh'cha" (which
we discussed above) distort their spiritual sight, the Israelites could not
bear the glory which emanated from Moshe's face when he came down from the
Mountain. He was therefore obliged to cover his face with a veil ("mas'veh"). "But we [on
the other hand] all with our face having been unveiled, having beheld
the glory of YHVH in a mirror [the "Torah of liberty"], are being
changed into the same image from glory to glory, as from YHVH, the Spirit"
(2nd Cor. 3:18 italics added). Truly something to be thankful for
and not to be taken lightly!
Hebrew Tools for Everyday
Use
YHVH’s congregation or assembly - “kahal”-
is used currently as “crowd” or “audience”. We have several references to
“males” –“z’charim” – literally, “those who remembered” in the Parasha. “Zachar”
(lit. “he remembered”) is also the word for “male”. Betzal’el and his “tent
making” will come in use, as we will “rest in the shadow…” but at the same time
we will not forget to “laugh”- “yitzchak” (“he will laugh”, and of course also
the name of our ancestor, Isaac).
The audience/crowd remembered to laugh
Ha’ka’hal zachar li’tzchok
The males rested in the shadow of the tents
Ha’zcharim nachu be’tzel ha’ohalim
Yitzchak rested in the shadow of the tent
Yitzchak nach be’tzel ha’ohel