Last week's Parashat Cha’yey Sarah ended
with the chronicles of Yishma'el's descendants. This week’s portion opens up
with the chronicles of his brother, Yitzchak.
But while “toldot” means "begetting" (root y.l.d
- “to give birth”), here “toldot” starts out with the barrenness of Yitzchak’s
wife. Rivka’s condition, however, is inserted in an almost parenthetical manner
and is couched between Yitchak's intercession on her behalf and YHVH's response
to the plea.
In 25:21 it says that Yitzchak “entreated”
- “vaya'a'tor” (a.t.r. - ayin, tav, resh) – YHVH, and "YHVH was entreated
“(vaye'ater) of him" (italics added). The very form of the verbs
(“entreat” – “entreated”) - both in the original Hebrew and in the English
translation - points to the closeness of the “entreatee” to the “entreater,”
and the latter’s deep empathy for the former.
When the request is granted it takes the
form of not one, but two sons, the first of whom comes out red all over (ref.
25: 25). The word for “red” is “adom,” and as we saw in Parashat
B’resheet (Genesis 1-4), “adom” is connected to “dam” (“blood”), “adama”
(“earth”), and thence to Adam, "the first man" who is
"earthy" (ref.1 Cor. 15:47). Esav, the firstborn, illustrates
therefore the principle that the natural precedes the spiritual (ref 1 Cor.
15:46), despite the fact that his twin turns out to be, for a considerable time
period, almost as 'earthy' as the ‘Hairy Red.’
This second boy, who emerged out of Rivka's
womb while holding on to the “heel” – “ah'kev” - of his brother
was hence named “Ya'acov” (ref. 25:26). Coming in the footsteps of his
sibling, his name, which also means "to follow," perfectly
matches the order of the births. In Scripture, the image of ‘heel-holding’ or
‘heel-grabbing’ often refers to hindering or trapping someone, as we see in the
following examples:
“Dan shall be a serpent... that bites the
horse's heels” (Gen. 49:17); “The trap shall take him by the heel” (Job 18:9);
“They mark my steps” (literally “heels” in Ps. 56:6). The following words in
T’hilim (Psalms) 41:9 hint at Messiah’s destiny: “My own familiar friend, which
did eat of my bread, has lifted his heel against me.” This type of friend and follower typically
steals quietly behind the one whom he follows, with a “crafty” intent (as
indeed was the case with Messiah’s “familiar friend”). Thus, from the same root
of “heel” and “to follow”, (a.k.v. - ayin, kof, vet) stem words like “crafty,
cunning and deceptive,” as is illustrated by the alliteration in Yirmiyahu
(Jeremiah) 9:4: “surely every brother deals
craftily (ah'kov ya'akov)” (italics added).
In the first scene that brings the two
siblings together, Ya'acov is busy cooking lentil broth, while his brother
happens to be returning, famished and exhausted, from the field. Esav is sorely
tempted when his glance strikes what he calls “ha'adom, ha'adom ha'zeh” - "this red, red stuff…
therefore his name was called Edom" (25:30) - again from the root “adom” –
“red.” The area of Edom ,
which later was inhabited by Esav's descendants, is indeed noted for its red soil.
Everything about this hunter speaks of adom-adama - earth, earthiness. Whether
Ya'acov anticipated his brother's famished condition or not, we do not know. Nevertheless,
while in English it says, "Jacob cooked a stew," in Hebrew it says:
“va'ya'zed Ya'acov na'zid,” which, aside from cooking stew can also be read as:
"Ya'acov devised an evil plot" (25:29). After all, 'cooking up' such
a plan was only consistent with his name! The word “nah’zid” - “broth”
- stems from the root z.y.d. (zayin, yod, dalet) which is shared by the verb to
“cook,” and more specifically, to “boil up and seethe.” This verb also lends
itself to “evil-doing” and “malice” – such as “zed” and “zadon” (e.g. Ex.
21:14, where “a man schemes” is “yazed”). All of this seems to be at variance with the earlier
description (25:27) of Yaacov, as an “eesh tam,” literally, “a man of
integrity” (although most translations use “peaceful” here), “living in tents” (while
Esav’s lifestyle and implied disposition is very different). The inconsistency
in the depiction of Yaacov’s character is not surprising in the narrative of
this particular Parasha, which is replete with contrasts, masquerades, and
pretenses.
Ya’acov does not waste any time. He proposes
right away an exchange: broth for birthright (ref. v. 31). And while in English
these words form an alliteration, in Hebrew the verb "sell” (in the
imperative form) – “michra,” and "birthright" –
“b'chora,” sound alike. (Perhaps this association is what gave Ya'acov
the idea in the first place…). Ya'acov, however, does not provide the goods
until he makes his brother swear to him that he will not renege on his
“sh'vu'ah” (“oath,” connected, as we have learned in previous Parashot, to being
“full and satisfied”). After the deal is struck the two depart, and until
further notice both seem to be content.
Later on, when the time comes for Esav to
claim his birthright (that is the right hand blessing of the father before
death), startled by his brother’s cunning, he “cried out with an exceedingly
great and bitter cry: ... ‘Is not he rightly named, Ya'acov? For he has
supplanted (akav) me...?’” (Gen. 27:34, 36).
The prophet Hoshe'ah (Hosea), many centuries later, traces the
waywardness of the nation of Yisrael (who in this prophecy is called “Ya'acov”)
to their progenitor: “In the womb he
took his brother by the heel- akav” (Hos. 12:3).
“In the wake of,” or “as a result of,”
or in short “because,” is the Biblical word “ekev “(again deriving
from the root a.k.v). In 26:4-5 of our
Parasha, YHVH says to Yitzchak: “I will multiply your descendants as the stars
of heaven, and will give your descendants all these lands; and by your
descendants all the nations of the earth shall be blessed; because
[“ekev”] Abraham obeyed Me and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes and
My laws” (italics added). Following Avraham’s implicit obedience he was told: “And
in your seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, because –
ekev - you have obeyed My voice” (22:18). “Ekev”
is found in Dvarim (Deuteronomy 8:20): “So you shall perish because you
would not listen.” It is also in David’s self-implicating reply to the prophet
Nah'tan (Nathan), who challenged him with a parable following his sin with
Bat’sheva (Bathsheba): “He must make restitution for the lamb, because
he did this thing and had no compassion (2nd Sam.12:6, italics
added). Thus, this little “ekev” - “because” – becomes the fulcrum on which the
balance of justice hangs.
Ya'acov, too, because of (“ekev”) his
actions (particularly that of deceiving his father), had to endure the
consequences. By the end of the Parasha he becomes a fugitive, running for his
life from his brother, and later (in the next Parasha), to be deceived by his
father-in-law, Lah'van (Laban). The “heart” of Ya'acov is well described by
Yirmiyahu, who says that it is “more deceitful (akov) than all else” (17:9, see
also the previous reference, Jer. 9:4).
In a few weeks time, in Parashat Vayishlach,
we shall see how Ya'acov, while on the road back from Padan Aram to Cna’an
(Canaan), will plan once again to use some cunning by walking behind – which also
suggests ‘following’ - his entourage, that was to go ahead of him to greet
Esav. At this point he will be met face to face, as he himself testifies in
B’resheet (Genesis) 32:30, by YHVH Elohim. Yisrael, according to the name that will
be given to him after this encounter at Penniel, will be made to turn around on
his heels as it were (and become lame in the process), never to be the same
again. Thus when the “crooked” (“akov”) places become “mishor” – that is
“straight” (ref. Is. 40:4b) - Ya'acov will become “Yeshurun” (“yashar” - straight”),
true to his name “Yisra’el,” which can also be read “yashar-el” (“El is
upright”). As such, the nation is addressed by their Elohim: “But now listen, O
Ya'acov, My servant; and Israel, whom I have chosen; thus says YHVH who made
you, and formed you from the womb [as ‘crooked’ Ya'acov], and Who will help
you: do not fear, O Ya'acov My servant; and you Yeshurun [who was
‘straightened’ by Elohim] whom I have chosen” (Is. 44:1, 2). Lastly, Ya'acov
was to become one of the forefathers of Messiah, of whom it was prophesied that
His heel would be “bruised” by the serpent. However, as we know, the “Seed of
the woman” was destined to triumph by crushing and trampling down the serpent’s
head with His heel (ref. Gen. 3:15; cf. Luke 10:19; Rom. 16:20; Heb.1:13b).
Back to our
narrative: Following closely on the
heels of the oath that Esav took by his brother’s instigation (25:31-33), YHVH
reminds Yitzchak of His oath to Avraham, and at the same time cautions
him not to go down to Egypt, in spite of the famine in the land (ref. 26:1-5),
saying: “Do not go down into Egypt. Dwell in the land which I
shall tell you” (v. 2). The imperative “dwell,” “sh’chan”
(sh.ch.n, shin, chaf, noon), is also “settle and abide” and it is
from this root that “mishkan,” the “tabernacle” in the wilderness, derives its
title. On this very issue, David makes an emphatic statement: “Trust in YHVH,
and do good; you shall dwell in the land, and you shall be fed on truth”
(Ps. 37:3 italics added). Continuing to address Yitzchak, in the next verse (25:3),
YHVH says to him: “Dwell in this land…” (italics added), but this time the verb used is “gur,” from which is
obtained the term “ger” - sojourner. Notice that above, YHVH exhorts
Yitzchak to live in “the land,” whereas the second reference is to “this land.”
If Yitzchak abides in the land, “which I [YHVH] shall tell you,” he will
have a secure and sure dwelling, but living in this land (‘this world’)
he will only be a sojourner (cf. Heb. 11:9). If in fact a distinction is made
here between “the land” and “this land,” even though dealing with
the same piece of real-estate, perhaps it is Yitzchak’s choice of attitudes
which is being addressed.
At this point in time Yitzchak and Rivka happen to settle in Grar (notice the
alliteration of “gur” and “Grar,” ref. 26:1), and when being asked about his
wife, the Patriarch does not resort to truth. Like his father before him, fear
for his life causes him to present his wife as his sister. But what finds
Yitzchak out is his act of (literally) "laughing with his
wife" (26:8), translated in English "caressing" (or some other
equivalent expression). If nothing else, in this episode Yitzchak remains… at
least… true to his name…
It is in this year of drought
that Yitzchak, against all odds, is sowing seed. “Seed” is “zerah”
(of the root z.r.a, zayin, resh, ayin, which is also shared by “arm” –
“z’ro’ah”), with the yield being "one hundredfold" (26:12). Earlier
(in 26:4) YHVH spoke to Yitzchak about his progeny (“zerah”), mentioning its future
increase. Is the great harvest that Yitzchak reaps here (during the famine) symbolic
of the future fulfillment of YHVH's word, under all and any conditions?
Yitzchak's
wealth increases tremendously and his neighbors, the Philistines, are jealous
of him (26:14) and thus Avimelech their king demands, "Go away from us,
for you are much mightier than we" (v. 16). “You are much mightier”
is “atzam’ta,” from the root a.tz.m (ayin, tazdi, mem). The usage and
meaning of this term will prove to be very significant during the Egyptian
exile (in Sh’mot – Exodus – chapter 1 it is found in verses 7,9 and 20), and
will motivate the Par’oh (Pharaoh) to try to annihilate Yisrael.
In our case, Yitzchak’s jealous neighbors take
recourse in filling up all the wells that have been dug by Avraham's servants
(ref. 26:15, 18b). In doing this they are "withholding benefits from both
themselves and their cattle! But in addition to stopping up the wells, they
fill them with earth so as to obliterate their existence altogether and make
sure that no water would ever flow out of them again. Why did they wish the
land to be desolate?[1]” The explanation that follows, quoted from
Haketav Vehakabala, points out that Yitzchak gave the wells the same names that
his father had given them (as we see in v. 18). “These names, such as, YHVH
Will See, YHVH is My Sign, The Well of Him that Lives and Sees Me, mark the
kindness of the Lord."[2]
This was done in order "to spread abroad the knowledge of the Lord and
show the people that idols were valueless. Avraham thought out a wonderful
device to help to bring those who were misled, under the wings of the Divine
Presence. He called the well by a name that would drive home the lesson of the
existence of the One True God. By this, he would arouse in them an awareness of
the truth by saying, ‘Let us go and draw water from the well of the eternal
God!’ The wells were a public necessity, and in this manner, the people were
initiated into the knowledge of the true God. Whilst he was alive his fear was
upon them [i.e. the locals], as they left the wells intact with their names,
but after his death they reverted to idolatry. In order to erase from their
memory the names of these wells, which recalled the very opposite of their
false opinions, they stopped them up. With the disappearance of the wells, the
names also disappeared…. Isaac followed in his father's footsteps and
endeavored to dig out these same wells and resurrect their names in order to
restore the crown of the true faith to its former glory."[3]
The wording in 26:19, where Yitzchak's
servants dig "a well of living water" (translated “running water”),
confirms what we have just read regarding the wells of the Patriarchs. The
locals fill up the wells, and now they are being re-named, as pointed out, in
order to erase the testimony of the Elohim of Yisrael. The name of the first
well is “Esek,” “contention” (v. 20). The name of the next, is “Sitna,”
“hostility; accusation” (v. 21). It is from the same root, s.t.n
(sin, tet, noon), that we get the word “Satan,” the “accuser.” A closely
connected word to “sitna” is “sin'ah” (s.n.a, sin, noon, alef) - “hatred.”
This verb is used in Yitzchak’s query in 26:27: “Why do you hate me?” A similar
word, both in sound and meaning appears toward the end of our Parasha. In 27:41
it says of Esav that he "bore a grudge against Ya'acov," which
is “sotem” (s.t.m. sin/shin, tet, mem). The progressive rate of
hostility is seen very clearly by this string of sounds: “soten, to accuse;
sotem, to bear a grudge, and soneh, to hate,” demonstrating accurately how each
of these conditions, if left unchecked, will lead to the next one.
When a third well is dug up, some distance
away, “they did not quarrel over it; so he named it Rechovot, for he said, 'at
last YHVH has made room for us, and we will be fruitful in the land’” (26:22).
“Rechovot” is of the root r.ch.v (resh, chet, vet), meaning, "broad,
wide, or making room." Thus, enlarging and broadening the
subsistence space brings relief, as we see in T’hilim (Psalms) 4:1, where David
cries out: "Answer me when I call, O Elohim of my righteousness, You gave
room [“hirchav’ta”] to me in trouble – literally in a place of
narrowness” (italics added), words with which, in his present situation, Yitzchak
would certainly have concurred.
[1] Studies in Bereshit,
Toldot 1, Nechama Leibowitz, trans. Aryeh Newman. Eliner Library, Department for Torah
Education and Culture in the Diaspora. Hemed Books Inc., Brooklyn ,
N.Y
2 ibid
3 ibid
Hebrew Tools for
Everyday Use
Here are some of the
words we will be incorporating in our study of everyday Hebrew: The root “r.ch.v for
“broad” is shared by “rechov” – street. The Biblical “ger” – sojourner, and the
root g.u.r (“fear”) lend themselves to “residing” in Modern Hebrew. From “Miskan” and
“shochen” – dwelling – we obtain “shachen” – “neighbor”, while “selling” is
still “mocher” and “seed” or “seeds” are “zerah” and “z’ra’eem” respectively. And of course we can’t leave out the
“laughter” which has been accompanying us since last week.
Yisrael gar bir’chov
ra’chav
Yisrael lives on a
broad street
Hashachen
ha’ya’shar mocher z’ra’eem
The honest neighbor
sells seeds
Hashachen
ha’ya’shar machar z’ra’eem
The honest neighbor sold seeds
Yitzchak tza’chak
Yitzchak laughed
Rivka tza’chaka
Rivka laughed
Recording
1 comment:
Thank you Ephraim and Rimona for writing this post! I have never quite understood why the wells were named, or even why those nearby would stop them up. (Why would they essentially cut themselves off from water, especially in a place where it is so valuable?) By expressing that Abraham named them to communicate that these were from YHVH and a blessing from Him makes so much sense! Even today, only the depravity of man and those who are caught up in idolatry would want to erase and "stop up" anything that comes from our heavenly Father. Any insights into how to unstop the wells of today? Shabbat Shalom and Blessings!
Post a Comment