"And YHVH spoke to Moses in the wilderness…" (emphasis added), are the opening words of the Torah's fourth book, Bamidbar (Numbers). In this first verse YHVH is "speaking" – "va’ydaber" – “in the wilderness" - "ba-midbar" - both words originating from the same multifaceted root - d.v.r (dalet, bet/vet, resh). Let us examine this root and follow it to a number of unexpected places.
“In the beginning was the word (davar), and the word (davar) was with Elohim, and Elohim was the word (“davar”)… And the word (davar) became flesh and lived among us…” (John 1:1,14). Davar is the spoken word, the all-powerful utterance that creates or generates everything, while “thing” is also "davar." Thus, all "things" appear to be the results of that which has been "said" or "spoken." In the Tanach many terms, such as “lies, wisdom, falsehood, truth” and more, are preceded by “d’var” – meaning “thing of….” indicating that the origin of all things is the ‘utterance’. Davar is that which proceeds out of the mouth of Elohim, and is therefore "the Word of Elohim." “Matters” or “business” are also “davar” (or “dvarim” in plural form), as we see for example in Shmot (Exodus) 5:13, 19: “Fulfill your works, your – dvarim - daily tasks" (emphasis added), and in Shoftim (Judges) 18:7, reference is made to the Danites who “… had no – dvarim - business with any man” (emphasis added). Terms such as “deeds" (Jer. 5:28, speaking of "deeds of the wicked") are also “dvarim.” "Reason, motives, customs" (“the custom of the king” in Esther 1:13) also fall within the framework of “davar.” The literal rendering for “after the order of Malchitzedek” (ref. Ps. 110:4), is “upon my divra, Malchitzedek,” that is, “upon my word.” The form “divra” illustrates the depth and scope of “davar,” which may be also rendered as an “order, pattern, type, arch or proto type." Likewise the “Ten Commandments” are “aseret ha-d’varim,” that is, “the ten words” (Ex. 34:28; Deut. 4:13, 10:4).
From this point let us venture further a-field to “dever,” which is "plague," or “pestilence.” Although this abrupt transition may seem curious, it is consistent with many such disparities found in the Tanach. If we remember that "davar" also means "cause," than the "plague," or "dever," illustrates the principle that “the curse causeless/without reason shall not come” (Pro. 26:2). Indeed, time after time the plague is the result of rebellion against Elohim, as in the case of the plagues of
. YHVH says to Yirmiyahu
(Jeremiah) about the people of Yisrael: “I will consume them by the sword, and
by the famine and by the plague - dever” (Jer. 14:12 italics added). The
following is what He speaks to the Egypt through the
prophet Y’chezkel (Ezekiel): “The sword from without and the plague –
dever - from within” (Ez. 7:15 italics added). Amos 4:10 records another
warning by Elohim to send a plague upon His people. Land
"Subdue” or "destroy" stem once again from the root d.v.r, with its infinitive “lehadbir.” In T’hilim (Psalms) 18:47 we find for example: “Elohim… subdues the people under me” (emphasis added). This verb also means “to expel or send away," such as sending off the flock to pasture, or to the desert. Thus in Mi’cha (Micah) 2:12 the flocks are seen in the midst of their “hidabar,” which is translated "fold" or "pasture."
Hence the "subdued" enemy (or the sinner) is often “pursued," "sent away," or “driven” to the "wilderness" or "desert" - the "midbar." But just as the wilderness may turn out to be a place of “pasture” for the flocks, it may also become a place of repentance and spiritual refreshing to those who are fleeing (or are forced) there. In the “midbar’s” stillness there are many opportunities to hear the voice of YHVH sounding His Word. The Bible records an impressive list of those who can attest to this fact. Another place where YHVH’s voice is heard is in the Holy of Holies (or “inner sanctuary”), which in Solomon’s
is called Dvir (ref. 1st Kings 6:16). Dvir is the furthest and innermost place
within the Temple . Divine communication, therefore, is to be
found in the furthest and remotest of places; sometimes even in a land of
banishment and punishment, which may not only become a refreshing oasis, but
may even turn into a 'Holy of Holies.' Temple
In summation, the Word, as epitomized by the Son of Elohim, is life giving, but rejecting Him (the "Davar") may result in a plague (“dever”), which subdues and drives ("madbir") one to the desert ("midbar"), there to be spoken to ("daber") by the Living Word ("Davar") Who utters the Word of Truth ("dvar emet") in His inner sanctuary, or most holy place (dvir). “And I will woo her to Me in the wilderness…” we read in Hoshe’ah (Hosea) 2:14. D.v.r teaches us why it was essential for the Israelites to go through their wilderness journey on the road to becoming a nation.
Chapters 1 and 2 of Bamidbar describe the formation of the congregation of Yisrael’s encampment for the purpose of a census (cf. Ex. 30:11-16). However, whereas on the previous occasion (in Exodus) each of them had to "give a ransom for his soul to YHVH while numbering them" (which was of one half shekel that was used for the Mishkan), here they are not required to do so.
"Lift the heads of all the congregation of the sons of Israel, by their families, by their fathers' houses, according to the number of names, every male, by their skulls” (literal translation, Num. 1:2 emphasis added). "Nahmanides emphasizes that the census was personal and individual… impressing on us the value and sterling worth of each and every soul which is a unique specimen of divine creativity and a world of its own." In the same vein, Isaac Arama says: "They were not just like animals or material objects, but each one had an importance of his own like a king or a priest. Indeed Elohim had shown special love towards them and this is the significance of mentioning each one of them by name and status; for they were all equal and individual in status." Yeshua’s death, for each and every man (ref. Heb. 2:9) on the Hill of "Golgota," which is Aramaic for "skull," lends an even greater credence to the above statements.
In Hebrew Insights into Parashat Shmot (Ex. 1-6:1) we noted that, as soon as the Egyptians embarked on their program of subjugating the Hebrews they treated them as a nameless mass (ref. Ex. 1:10-12), while at the same time attempting to carry out infanticide (Ex. 1:16). This is in striking contrast to what we encounter in Bamidbar chapter
In Verse 18 we read, “State their genealogies,” or
“declare their pedigree,” or “register their ancestry” (depending on the
translation), which is designated by one word - “hit’yaldu” - the root
being y.l.d (yod, lamed, dalet) for “child” or “to give birth,” or “midwife”
(this, bringing to mind the two midwives who saved the lives of the baby boys
from the cruel edict of Par’oh). The usage here of this verb is the only place where
it is found in this form, literally meaning to “become a child.” Thus,
the restoration of the nameless individuals and clans to their respective
origins, with the various groupings and families being recognized, acknowledged
and brought to the fore, is part of the redemption process. This aspect of
redemption will one day be experienced again when all the names of the
families, clans and tribes of Yisrael will be revealed, so as to make up the
full Commonwealth of the Household of Yisrael.
When the roll call was completed and the Levites' duties in the Mishkan were dispensed, "YHVH spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying: 'Everyone of the children of
shall camp by his own
standard, beside the emblems of his father's house; they shall camp some
distance from the tabernacle of meeting'" (2:1, 2). The organizational process, of turning the
former slaves into a nation, is continuing.
The Israelites were to array themselves according to their tribes in
specified directions around the Mishkan.
The “standard" mentioned here (and in 1:52) is "degel,"
of the root d.g.l (dalet, gimmel, lamed). In Shir HaShirim (Song of Songs) 5:10
we read: "My Beloved is bright and ruddy, standing out among ten
thousand". “Standing out" is "dagul," of the same root as
“degel”. "Dagul" may also be interpreted as "chosen" and
"selected." Again, in the same
book, the betrothed says about her beloved, "And His banner
("diglo") over me is love" (2:4). The various banners, or
standards (according to the respective tribes) with their emblems, were
indicative of YHVH's favor and love toward His "select" people, and
over each member of this chosen race. Israel
The "emblems", mentioned above in 2:2, are "otot" (plural, and "ot" singular). "Ot" (alef, vav, tav) is a widely used term, denoting "sign, token, pledge, assurance, miracle, omen" and more. Although we do not know what the banners looked like, it appears that each of them had the "ot," or sign, of a particular "father's house," which rendered each tribe much like a family related to a single progenitor.
Concerning the grouping around the Mishkan, which was in the midst of the camp, Nahmanides says in relationship to this edifice: “It was a kind of
Sinai on which the Torah was given, accompanying them on all their
journeying.” Benno Jaccob follows up this idea: “The Lord transferred His
presence from Sinai to the Tabernacle, from the sanctuary of the Lord which His
hands had established, to the sanctuary which had
made'"2 This may account for the
strict orders of the camp's formation. Israel
The above mentioned orders, regarding the tribes and their placements, excluded the Levites who were to serve in the Mishkan, and were to be at YHVH's disposal. In the course of the detailed description of their duties and responsibilities for the various parts of the Mishkan, mention is made of the edifice’s sides (Num. 3:29, 35). The Hebrew word here for “side” is “yarech,” of the root y.r.ch (yod, resh, kaf/chaf), meaning “thigh, loin or base.” The thigh represents man’s strength and power (see Gen. 24:2; 47:29), both in terms of virility and force (being also the place upon which the sword was placed). That is why in order for Ya’acov to become Yisrael his thigh had to be injured, and likewise the repentant one, who in order to demonstrate his true intentions smites that part of his body (e.g. Jer. 31:19, Ephraim’s repentance). Similar to the root d.v.r. in some of its uses, “yarech” also refers to the “furthermost point,” to the “backside” or to the “rear” (Jud. 19:1, Is. 14:15), and hence the application to “side.”
The vicarious role of the Levites as firstborn follows in Bamidbar 3:41, 45 with a reference to their required conduct. It says there that, they were to be taken “instead” or “in place of all the firstborn among the sons of
.” The word for “Instead,”
or “in place of,” here (and in numerous other places) is “tachat,”
meaning “rear, under or underneath,” thus underscoring the
required attitude of humility and servitude congruent with the tasks assigned to YHVH’s
In chapter 4 we view how the chosen family of K'hat (Kohath) was to dismantle the Mishkan when it was time to move on. During this awesome procedure they had to restrain themselves and avert their gaze from the holy articles, with the help of A'haron and his sons (vs 19, 20). "They shall not go in to see the holy things as they are being covered, lest they die," is the Parasha's last verse, which literally says, "And they shall not go in to see, at the swallowing of the holy things [lest] they die." The usage here of "swallow" ("bela") for "covering" the Mishkan articles is very unusual. It may be alluding to the fact that an unwarranted gaze could bring upon the onlookers (that is, the members of the K'hat clan) the penalty of being swallowed alive (a form of punishment which was sometimes inflicted – supernaturally - upon offenders, such as in the case of Achan in Num. 16:30-34). Thus, A'haron’s family was being charged with responsibility over the lives of their brothers, the K'hats, whose "keepers" they were to be.
1 New Studies in Bamidbar, Nechama Leibowitz, trans. Aryeh
Newman. Eliner Library, Department for Torah Education and
Culture in the Diaspora. Hemed Books Inc.,
Hebrew Tools for Everyday Use
Most of our attention in the above article was focused on the root d.v/b.r which is still used widely and commonly in Modern Hebrew. Let us do some conjugating of this verb and in this way practice using it. In our Parasha we encountered the unique usage of “hitya’ldu” for “pedigree”, or “genealogy”, while the noun “yeled” is the common word for “child” and “moledet” is one’s “homeland”. This takes us to the “banner”, which in Bamidbar 2:2 is “degel” and in everyday speech is used for “flag”.
I (masculine) speak Hebrew
Ani me’da’ber Ivrit
I (feminine) do not speak Hebrew
Ani lo meh’da’be’ret Ivrit
You (masculine) talk much
Ata me’da’ber harbeh
You (feminine) speak English
At me’da’be’ret Anglit
He is speaking to the child
Hu meda’ber el ha’yeled
The girl is speaking about (lit. “on”) the homeland
Ha’yal’da me’da’be’ret al ha’moledet
The homeland’s flag (lit. the flag of the homeland)
Ha’degel shel ha’moledet